posted
07/22/11
We recently redesigned Chickipedia. Because the site has a passionate following, we want to give you a place to voice any specific concerns/issues/thoughts/comments/gripes about the site’s new design and functionality.
Some of you have written to express your disappointment with the new design. (For the record, most of you seem to welcome it.) Regardless, we welcome the criticism, because we can use it to make the site better. Please do us a favor, though, and explain exactly what it is that can be improved upon. Be specific and use the Comment section below.
We look forward to hearing your thoughts.
COMMENTS
July 22, 2011 9:11 am
Gerry Blak
The design is nice but the search option and the similar chicks search are a bit tricky… Generally it seems to be slower and more difficult to use…
July 22, 2011 2:29 pm
Jeff Crull
I wish when i typed in a name for a search it gave me suggestions when you type. also i don’t like having to click in the chickipedia box to search.
July 23, 2011 4:15 am
paldinesh
Nice design loved it … better than previous version only thing which I miss is the latest girls updated which could be seen right on the main screen in earlier version
July 23, 2011 11:13 am
Alejandro
i dont like the new website layout as it is harder to navigate. one thing in particualr is that when you begin to type a name in the search bar, it doesn’t auto-complete the search or provide a thumbnail. and when i do search someone up, about 3/4 of the time it will display “this page does not exist.” please bring back the old website!!
July 23, 2011 5:55 pm
sam jones
default on search should be chickapedia not articles
July 24, 2011 12:02 pm
ThereWasOne?
Can we get a wider selection of chicks on the home page please? Why do Denise Milani, Heather Brooke, Jordan Carver, and Keeley Hazell have to take up more than one space on the home page? You have more than 10,000 chicks in your database, how about some variety. Thanks!
July 25, 2011 1:35 am
Bryce
I’m not clear on how to access a list of the chicks I have put in mychicks.
July 25, 2011 4:53 am
fordt
Please, just change it back.
July 25, 2011 10:48 am
I Can Read
Did Heather Brooke pay you guys to permanently keep her breasts, I mean picture, on your front page? This chick barely meets the Chickipedia requirement of “famous chicks only.” She has big tits, I get it. But so do plenty of other girls. How about putting their photos up front.
P.S. you need to bring back the auto-complete in the search box
July 25, 2011 10:26 pm
Ipsbidly
The old site was awesomely, but now it is cumbersome and difficult to navigate. In fact, I visit the site less often because it is too difficult to search and scroll through the content. After giving it a try for 2 weeks-ish, I vote you go back to the old format.
July 26, 2011 7:39 pm
RedLeg6
I think it really kinda sucks compared to before. Better graphics for those with highspeed inet, but for us dumb old rural rednecks that only have access to dial-up, it’s inconvenient and slower than snailshit.
July 26, 2011 7:57 pm
LP
I don’t mind the new format so much….but the way the search function um…..functions….not so good. Put the search back the way it was before, and that would make this new site much much better.
July 27, 2011 9:35 pm
Thick McRunfast
The new site looks nice, but both the search and most especially the alphabetical lookup functions have been ruined.
Clicking through many, many pages while browsing is incredibly slow and frustrating.
July 27, 2011 10:28 pm
NT
The “Photos” page was my favorite, because it gave a new set of chicks aot every 30 minutes. Instant variety for a quick break from work. The new frmat sees to make the pics smaller, is slower, and the pages with the bios are less compete and much harder to read… ok, I get that reading isn’t the point.
Please go back to the old format,or much better, give the user the choice of old or new that’s saved with a cookie!
July 28, 2011 10:58 am
Joe Donatelli
Please keep the comments coming. We read every single one and will implement those we can. Thank you. — The Editors
July 29, 2011 10:09 am
boobfan
This article has got to be BS, i cant imagine anyone actually liking the new site better. With no instant search and with the buzz section that just puts a bunch of BS sites for each girl, there is no reason for me to visit the site. I had a few favorite girls that i would check for new activity. Now i go to other sites for updates.
July 29, 2011 10:24 am
oia
you guys did a great job!
July 29, 2011 10:38 am
wilky1507
I like the look and layout better but I dont like the fact that I cant call up the list of mybabes like I could on the old site and on both versions you cant list your favs in the order you like them. If you could add these features it would be a ton better.
July 30, 2011 10:55 am
Wade T
Searching for info on a chicks name is a royal pain in the a**s. Trying to guess what page she is on is so 1990′s… Please return to previous format..
July 31, 2011 12:41 am
jae
The old layout was better for looking for individuals. You could easily scroll through the names. Now you have to page through and that takes a lot of time. Maybe offer an option for the thumbnails along with just having the names as before. I like teh main page a lot, though. keep that!
July 31, 2011 12:45 am
Craig Samson Ford II
this is a one is a whole better and more fun more easier more interactive. thanks a lot. no i am having fun.
July 31, 2011 4:19 pm
JAD
The new format sucks too much trouble to find anything.
August 1, 2011 12:30 am
I Can Read
Angelina Jolie was “Chick of the Week” two weeks ago, and now she’s “Chick of the Week” again?
Of the 27 spots for chicks on your home page, Angelina Jolie now takes up 2 spots, Lori Buckby 2, Keeley Hazel 2, Denise Milani 2, Alison Angel 3, and Wendy Fiore 3. Why should any chick take up more than one spot?
You’ve had the same three chicks under “These chicks need your help” for the last two weeks. If they haven’t got help by now, they’re not gettin any. Move on to someone else who needs help.
August 2, 2011 8:32 am
Steve W
I like most of the features of the new site but I really liked the “more photos” tab at the bottom of the old page. that should really be added to this one.